TY - JOUR
T1 - Sublobar resection for early-stage lung cancer
AU - Sakurai, Hiroyuki
AU - Asamura, Hisao
N1 - Funding Information:
Arjun Pennathur reports consulting and lecture fees from Covidien. James Luketich reports grant support and lecture fees from Accuray ; grant support from Angiodynamics ; grant support, lecture fees, and equity ownership in Stryker Endoscopy; and grant support and lecture fees from US Surgical/Covidien .
Publisher Copyright:
© Translational lung cancer research. All rights reserved.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Since the 1995 report of the prospective randomized trial of lobectomy versus sublobar resection for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) performed by the the Lung Cancer Study Group, lobectomy remains the standard of care for the surgical management of stage I NSCLC. Sublobar resection has been typically used for high-risk patients who are operative candidates but for whom a lobectomy is contraindicated. Recent advances in imaging and staging modalities and improved spatial resolution of computed tomography (CT) scan have refined the presentation and diagnosis of early-stage NSCLC. The detection of small tumors and ground-glass opacity (GGO) appearance associated with a favorable histology have led to the increased use of sublobar resection in many institutes to include good-risk patients. There is an increasing body of evidence that sublobar resection may achieve oncological outcomes similar to those with lobectomy in early-stage NSCLC, especially that 2 cm or less in size. However, whether or not sublobar resection constitutes adequate treatment for small-sized lung cancer or for the radiographic "early" lung cancer such as a GGO-dominant lesion is still being prospectively investigated. Sublobar resection will be expected to play an important role as a primary treatment option for patients with small stage IA NSCLC, based on an anatomical functional advantage over lobectomy as well as comparable prognostic outcomes between sublobsar resection and lobectomy.
AB - Since the 1995 report of the prospective randomized trial of lobectomy versus sublobar resection for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) performed by the the Lung Cancer Study Group, lobectomy remains the standard of care for the surgical management of stage I NSCLC. Sublobar resection has been typically used for high-risk patients who are operative candidates but for whom a lobectomy is contraindicated. Recent advances in imaging and staging modalities and improved spatial resolution of computed tomography (CT) scan have refined the presentation and diagnosis of early-stage NSCLC. The detection of small tumors and ground-glass opacity (GGO) appearance associated with a favorable histology have led to the increased use of sublobar resection in many institutes to include good-risk patients. There is an increasing body of evidence that sublobar resection may achieve oncological outcomes similar to those with lobectomy in early-stage NSCLC, especially that 2 cm or less in size. However, whether or not sublobar resection constitutes adequate treatment for small-sized lung cancer or for the radiographic "early" lung cancer such as a GGO-dominant lesion is still being prospectively investigated. Sublobar resection will be expected to play an important role as a primary treatment option for patients with small stage IA NSCLC, based on an anatomical functional advantage over lobectomy as well as comparable prognostic outcomes between sublobsar resection and lobectomy.
KW - Early-stage lung cancer
KW - Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
KW - Prognosis
KW - Sublobar resection
KW - Surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929514179&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929514179&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2014.06.11
DO - 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2014.06.11
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84929514179
SN - 2218-6751
VL - 3
SP - 164
EP - 172
JO - Translational Lung Cancer Research
JF - Translational Lung Cancer Research
IS - 3
ER -