TY - JOUR
T1 - Surgical glove perforation during laparoscopic colorectal procedures
AU - Matsuoka, Shinsei
AU - Kondo, Takayuki
AU - Seishima, Ryo
AU - Okabayashi, Koji
AU - Tsuruta, Masashi
AU - Shigeta, Kohei
AU - Ishida, Takashi
AU - Hasegawa, Hirotoshi
AU - Kitagawa, Yuko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Background: It has been reported that in conventional open surgery, approximately 10% of surgical gloves are perforated during surgery without being noticed. To protect both the patient and medical staff from harm, double gloving or changing gloves routinely at certain intervals during surgery is recommended. However, whether these protective measures are also necessary for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is unknown because the actual perforation rate during laparoscopic procedures is unclear. Methods: Seventy-seven laparoscopic colorectal surgeries were evaluated, and a total of 616 surgical gloves used in the surgeries were collected for analysis. The presence of glove perforation was tested by the standard water-leak test method (EN455-1). Results: Seven perforations were detected (1.1%). The duration of the laparoscopic procedure was not a statistically significant risk factor for glove perforation (p = 0.41). Postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs) were observed in 12 cases (15.6%), but there was no significant correlation between the presence of glove perforation and SSI (p = 0.92). According to the bacterial cultivation results, the majority of causative agents of SSI were enterobacteria, which belong to the major gut flora. Conclusion: Although the perforation rate was considerably lower than that in open surgery, surgical glove perforation occurred during laparoscopic procedures. Double gloving in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is recommended not to prevent SSI but to protect medical workers from harmful infections after direct contact with the patient.
AB - Background: It has been reported that in conventional open surgery, approximately 10% of surgical gloves are perforated during surgery without being noticed. To protect both the patient and medical staff from harm, double gloving or changing gloves routinely at certain intervals during surgery is recommended. However, whether these protective measures are also necessary for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is unknown because the actual perforation rate during laparoscopic procedures is unclear. Methods: Seventy-seven laparoscopic colorectal surgeries were evaluated, and a total of 616 surgical gloves used in the surgeries were collected for analysis. The presence of glove perforation was tested by the standard water-leak test method (EN455-1). Results: Seven perforations were detected (1.1%). The duration of the laparoscopic procedure was not a statistically significant risk factor for glove perforation (p = 0.41). Postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs) were observed in 12 cases (15.6%), but there was no significant correlation between the presence of glove perforation and SSI (p = 0.92). According to the bacterial cultivation results, the majority of causative agents of SSI were enterobacteria, which belong to the major gut flora. Conclusion: Although the perforation rate was considerably lower than that in open surgery, surgical glove perforation occurred during laparoscopic procedures. Double gloving in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is recommended not to prevent SSI but to protect medical workers from harmful infections after direct contact with the patient.
KW - Laparoscopic colorectal surgery
KW - Surgical glove perforation
KW - Surgical site infection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112297219&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85112297219&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-021-08670-0
DO - 10.1007/s00464-021-08670-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 34382122
AN - SCOPUS:85112297219
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 36
SP - 3489
EP - 3494
JO - Surgical endoscopy
JF - Surgical endoscopy
IS - 5
ER -