TY - JOUR
T1 - The Leontief Paradox Redux
AU - Kiyota, Kozo
N1 - Funding Information:
I have benefited from conversations on this topic with Fukunari Kimura. I also thank Associate Editor Hartmut Egger, Naoto Jinji, and seminar participants at Keio University. I acknowledge the financial support received from the JSPS Grants-in-Aid (JP18H03637). The usual disclaimers apply.
Funding Information:
I have benefited from conversations on this topic with Fukunari Kimura. I also thank Associate Editor Hartmut Egger, Naoto Jinji, and seminar participants at Keio University. I acknowledge the financial support received from the JSPS Grants‐in‐Aid (JP18H03637). The usual disclaimers apply. 1
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - Shortly after Edward E. Leamer found that the Leontief Paradox was based on a simple conceptual misunderstanding in 1980, Richard A. Brecher and Ehsan U. Choudhri in their 1982 article argued that the fact that the United States exported labor services was, in itself, paradoxical because it is true if and only if its per capita consumption is less than the world average. Surprisingly, however, no formal answer to this paradox has been provided for nearly four decades. This paper revisits this paradox and formally shows that the paradox can be resolved if the Heckscher–Ohlin–Vanek model takes into account technology differences across countries and trade imbalance. In contrast, the paradox cannot be resolved even if the analysis takes into account quasi-homothetic preferences, the Armington home bias, or offshoring.
AB - Shortly after Edward E. Leamer found that the Leontief Paradox was based on a simple conceptual misunderstanding in 1980, Richard A. Brecher and Ehsan U. Choudhri in their 1982 article argued that the fact that the United States exported labor services was, in itself, paradoxical because it is true if and only if its per capita consumption is less than the world average. Surprisingly, however, no formal answer to this paradox has been provided for nearly four decades. This paper revisits this paradox and formally shows that the paradox can be resolved if the Heckscher–Ohlin–Vanek model takes into account technology differences across countries and trade imbalance. In contrast, the paradox cannot be resolved even if the analysis takes into account quasi-homothetic preferences, the Armington home bias, or offshoring.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094648884&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85094648884&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/roie.12511
DO - 10.1111/roie.12511
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85094648884
SN - 0965-7576
VL - 29
SP - 296
EP - 313
JO - Review of International Economics
JF - Review of International Economics
IS - 2
ER -