TY - JOUR
T1 - The Worse Prognosis of Right-Sided Compared with Left-Sided Colon Cancers
T2 - a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
AU - Yahagi, Masashi
AU - Okabayashi, Koji
AU - Hasegawa, Hirotoshi
AU - Tsuruta, Masashi
AU - Kitagawa, Yuko
PY - 2015/11/16
Y1 - 2015/11/16
N2 - Background: Right-sided colon cancers (RCC) and left-sided colon cancers (LCC) are of different embryological origins, and various differences exist between them. However, the survival difference has not been assessed. The aim of this meta-analysis was to quantify the prognostic differences between RCC and LCC. Methods: Fifteen studies that compared the prognosis of colon cancer according to tumor location were identified. The effects of tumor location on survival outcome were assessed. Results: Patients with RCC had a significantly worse prognosis than did those with LCC in overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.14, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.06–1.22, p <0.01). Our subgroup analyses demonstrated significant prognostic differences in Western countries (HR = 1.15, 95 % CI 1.08–1.23, p <0.01), a nationwide database (HR = 1.15, 95 % CI 1.05–1.27, p = 0.01), and a stage-adjusted analysis (HR = 1.14, 95 % CI 1.05–1.24, p <0.01). Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that tumor location is associated with prognosis in colorectal cancer patients, and those with RCC have a significantly worse prognosis than those with LCC in terms of OS. RCC should be treated distinctively from LCC, and the establishment of standardized management for colon cancer by tumor location is needed.
AB - Background: Right-sided colon cancers (RCC) and left-sided colon cancers (LCC) are of different embryological origins, and various differences exist between them. However, the survival difference has not been assessed. The aim of this meta-analysis was to quantify the prognostic differences between RCC and LCC. Methods: Fifteen studies that compared the prognosis of colon cancer according to tumor location were identified. The effects of tumor location on survival outcome were assessed. Results: Patients with RCC had a significantly worse prognosis than did those with LCC in overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.14, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.06–1.22, p <0.01). Our subgroup analyses demonstrated significant prognostic differences in Western countries (HR = 1.15, 95 % CI 1.08–1.23, p <0.01), a nationwide database (HR = 1.15, 95 % CI 1.05–1.27, p = 0.01), and a stage-adjusted analysis (HR = 1.14, 95 % CI 1.05–1.24, p <0.01). Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that tumor location is associated with prognosis in colorectal cancer patients, and those with RCC have a significantly worse prognosis than those with LCC in terms of OS. RCC should be treated distinctively from LCC, and the establishment of standardized management for colon cancer by tumor location is needed.
KW - Colon cancer
KW - Left-sided colon
KW - Prognosis
KW - Right-sided colon
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947080931&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947080931&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11605-015-3026-6
DO - 10.1007/s11605-015-3026-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 26573851
AN - SCOPUS:84958121097
SN - 1091-255X
JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
ER -