TY - JOUR
T1 - Three-dimensional shoulder kinematics
T2 - Upright four-dimensional computed tomography in comparison with an optical three-dimensional motion capture system
AU - Yoshida, Yuki
AU - Matsumura, Noboru
AU - Miyamoto, Azusa
AU - Oki, Satoshi
AU - Yokoyama, Yoichi
AU - Yamada, Minoru
AU - Yamada, Yoshitake
AU - Nakamura, Masaya
AU - Nagura, Takeo
AU - Jinzaki, Masahiro
N1 - Funding Information:
Masahiro Jinzaki has received a grant from Canon Medical Systems. However, Canon Medical Systems was not involved in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or in the preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Information:
The authors are grateful to the Keiyu Orthopedic Hospital for contributing to this study. The authors also thank Tetsuya Fukawa for his assistance and Yasunori Sato for statistical advice. This study was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (grant number 17H04266 and 20K08056), Uehara Memorial Foundation, and Canon Medical Systems (Otawara, Japan).
Funding Information:
The authors are grateful to the Keiyu Orthopedic Hospital for contributing to this study. The authors also thank Tetsuya Fukawa for his assistance and Yasunori Sato for statistical advice. This study was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (grant number 17H04266 and 20K08056), Uehara Memorial Foundation, and Canon Medical Systems (Otawara, Japan).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Although shoulder kinematics have been analyzed by various methods, dynamic shoulder motion is difficult to track. This study aimed to validate the shoulder kinematic analysis using upright four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) and to compare the results with optical three-dimensional motion capture. During active elevation, bilateral shoulders of 10 healthy volunteers were tracked using 4DCT and motion capture. The scapulothoracic and glenohumeral rotations and the scapulohumeral rhythm (SHR) at each position were calculated, and the differences between 4DCT and motion capture were compared. During 10−140° of humerothoracic elevation, the scapulothoracic joint showed upward rotation, internal rotation, and posterior tilting, and the glenohumeral joint showed elevation, external rotation, and anterior plane of elevation in both analyses. In scapulothoracic rotations, the mean differences between the two analyses were −2.6° in upward rotation, 13.9° in internal rotation, and 6.4° in posterior tilting, and became significant with humerothoracic elevation ≥110° in upward rotation, ≥50° in internal rotation, and ≥100° in posterior tilting. In glenohumeral rotations, the mean differences were 3.7° in elevation, 9.1° in internal rotation, and −8.8° in anterior plane of elevation, and became significant with humerothoracic elevation ≥110° in elevation, ≥90° in internal rotation, and ≥100° in anterior plane of elevation. The mean overall SHRs were 1.8 in 4DCT and 2.4 in motion capture, and the differences became significant with humerothoracic elevation ≥100°. The 4DCT analysis of in vivo shoulder kinematics using upright computed tomography scanner is feasible, but the values were different from those by skin-based analysis at the elevated arm positions.
AB - Although shoulder kinematics have been analyzed by various methods, dynamic shoulder motion is difficult to track. This study aimed to validate the shoulder kinematic analysis using upright four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) and to compare the results with optical three-dimensional motion capture. During active elevation, bilateral shoulders of 10 healthy volunteers were tracked using 4DCT and motion capture. The scapulothoracic and glenohumeral rotations and the scapulohumeral rhythm (SHR) at each position were calculated, and the differences between 4DCT and motion capture were compared. During 10−140° of humerothoracic elevation, the scapulothoracic joint showed upward rotation, internal rotation, and posterior tilting, and the glenohumeral joint showed elevation, external rotation, and anterior plane of elevation in both analyses. In scapulothoracic rotations, the mean differences between the two analyses were −2.6° in upward rotation, 13.9° in internal rotation, and 6.4° in posterior tilting, and became significant with humerothoracic elevation ≥110° in upward rotation, ≥50° in internal rotation, and ≥100° in posterior tilting. In glenohumeral rotations, the mean differences were 3.7° in elevation, 9.1° in internal rotation, and −8.8° in anterior plane of elevation, and became significant with humerothoracic elevation ≥110° in elevation, ≥90° in internal rotation, and ≥100° in anterior plane of elevation. The mean overall SHRs were 1.8 in 4DCT and 2.4 in motion capture, and the differences became significant with humerothoracic elevation ≥100°. The 4DCT analysis of in vivo shoulder kinematics using upright computed tomography scanner is feasible, but the values were different from those by skin-based analysis at the elevated arm positions.
KW - 3D-3D registration
KW - hands up
KW - scapula kinematics
KW - shoulder function
KW - upright CT
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129054048&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85129054048&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jor.25342
DO - 10.1002/jor.25342
M3 - Article
C2 - 35430725
AN - SCOPUS:85129054048
SN - 0736-0266
VL - 41
SP - 196
EP - 205
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Research
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Research
IS - 1
ER -