TY - JOUR
T1 - Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis complicated by sigmoid septum
AU - Yamashita, Kizuku
AU - Fujita, Tomoyuki
AU - Fukushima, Satsuki
AU - Shimahara, Yusuke
AU - Kume, Yuta
AU - Matsumoto, Yorihiko
AU - Kawamoto, Naonori
AU - Minami, Kimito
AU - Kabata, Daijiro
AU - Kanzaki, Hideaki
AU - Izumi, Chisato
AU - Anzai, Toshihisa
AU - Kobayashi, Junjiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Japanese Circulation Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Background: In patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS), a sigmoid septum, characterized by subaortic interventricular hypertrophy, often results in the need for new pacemaker implantation (PMI). In this study, we reviewed the feasibility and treatment efficacy of TAVR for AS in patients with a sigmoid septum. Methods and Results: Between 2011 and 2016, 48 patients (25.4%; mean age 84.9±5.4 years; 9 males) with a sigmoid septum and 141 (74.6%; mean age 82.9±5.5 years; 61 males) without underwent TAVR. Their operative outcomes, echocardiographic and electrocardiographic findings, and long-term outcomes were retrospectively compared. Second TAVR because of valve malposition was performed in 3 patients with a sigmoid septum (6.3%) and in 2 patients without a sigmoid septum (1.4%), with no significant difference between the 2 groups. Although there was no significant difference in valve hemodynamics between the 2 groups, sigmoid septum and deep implantation (implantation depth ≥10 mm) were independent predictors of new PMI following TAVR. Conclusions: Although a sigmoid septum did not preclude the feasibility, safety, or efficacy of TAVR for severe AS, its presence was associated with new PMI. Our approach to TAVR in patients with a sigmoid septum may contribute to clinical outcomes comparable to those of patients without this pathology.
AB - Background: In patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS), a sigmoid septum, characterized by subaortic interventricular hypertrophy, often results in the need for new pacemaker implantation (PMI). In this study, we reviewed the feasibility and treatment efficacy of TAVR for AS in patients with a sigmoid septum. Methods and Results: Between 2011 and 2016, 48 patients (25.4%; mean age 84.9±5.4 years; 9 males) with a sigmoid septum and 141 (74.6%; mean age 82.9±5.5 years; 61 males) without underwent TAVR. Their operative outcomes, echocardiographic and electrocardiographic findings, and long-term outcomes were retrospectively compared. Second TAVR because of valve malposition was performed in 3 patients with a sigmoid septum (6.3%) and in 2 patients without a sigmoid septum (1.4%), with no significant difference between the 2 groups. Although there was no significant difference in valve hemodynamics between the 2 groups, sigmoid septum and deep implantation (implantation depth ≥10 mm) were independent predictors of new PMI following TAVR. Conclusions: Although a sigmoid septum did not preclude the feasibility, safety, or efficacy of TAVR for severe AS, its presence was associated with new PMI. Our approach to TAVR in patients with a sigmoid septum may contribute to clinical outcomes comparable to those of patients without this pathology.
KW - Conduction disturbance
KW - Pacemaker implantation
KW - Septal bulge
KW - Sigmoid septum
KW - Transcatheter aortic valve replacement
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85057105350
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85057105350#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0264
DO - 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0264
M3 - Article
C2 - 30298851
AN - SCOPUS:85057105350
SN - 1346-9843
VL - 82
SP - 3090
EP - 3099
JO - Circulation Journal
JF - Circulation Journal
IS - 12
ER -