TY - JOUR
T1 - Updated results from GEST study
T2 - a randomized, three-arm phase III study for advanced pancreatic cancer
AU - on behalf of the GEST group
AU - Okusaka, Takuji
AU - Miyakawa, H.
AU - Fujii, H.
AU - Nakamori, S.
AU - Satoh, T.
AU - Hamamoto, Y.
AU - Ito, T.
AU - Maguchi, H.
AU - Matsumoto, S.
AU - Ueno, H.
AU - Ioka, T.
AU - Boku, N.
AU - Egawa, S.
AU - Hatori, T.
AU - Furuse, J.
AU - Mizumoto, K.
AU - Ohkawa, S.
AU - Yamaguchi, T.
AU - Yamao, K.
AU - Funakoshi, A.
AU - Chen, J. S.
AU - Cheng, A. L.
AU - Sato, A.
AU - Ohashi, Y.
AU - Tanaka, M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank all the patients, their families, the investigators, and the medical staff. The GEST study was sponsored by Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. in Japan and TTY Biopharm Co. Ltd. in Taiwan. This work was funded by Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and TTY Biopharm Co. Ltd. Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. was involved in the coordination of the clinical trial sites and the medical monitoring and biostatistical support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, The Author(s).
PY - 2017/6/1
Y1 - 2017/6/1
N2 - Purpose: The GEST study showed non-inferiority of S-1 but not superiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) to gemcitabine alone for overall survival with the data by the cut-off date of 31st July in 2010 for chemo-naïve patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. We considered it important to determine whether S-1 maintains non-inferiority after a long-term follow-up in the GEST study and to obtain a firm positive conclusion. In addition, it may be an interesting challenge to explore the efficacious profile of GS in the long-term follow-up study. Using the data from the follow-up period, background and efficacy in patients from Taiwan and Japan, as well as the rates of tumor shrinkage in locally advanced and metastatic patients (Waterfall plot) were also analyzed. Methods: The results of the primary analysis were reconfirmed, and subset analysis of overall survival and progression-free survival was performed based on the overall survival data updated by the cut-off date of 31st July in 2011. Results: The median follow-up period was 29.8 months, and 795 deaths occurred (95.6%). The median overall survival was 8.8 months for gemcitabine, 9.7 months for S-1 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.79–1.17), and 9.9 months for GS (HR 0.91; 97.5% CI 0.75–1.11). In patients with performance status (PS) 0, the median overall survival was 9.8 months for gemcitabine, 10.9 months for S-1, and 10.5 months for GS. In patients with PS 1, the median overall survival was 6.2 months for gemcitabine, 6.3 months for S-1, and 9.6 months for GS. Conclusion: Our survey reconfirmed the non-inferiority of S-1 to gemcitabine and showed S-1 can be used as one of the standard treatment options for advanced pancreatic cancer. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00498225.
AB - Purpose: The GEST study showed non-inferiority of S-1 but not superiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) to gemcitabine alone for overall survival with the data by the cut-off date of 31st July in 2010 for chemo-naïve patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. We considered it important to determine whether S-1 maintains non-inferiority after a long-term follow-up in the GEST study and to obtain a firm positive conclusion. In addition, it may be an interesting challenge to explore the efficacious profile of GS in the long-term follow-up study. Using the data from the follow-up period, background and efficacy in patients from Taiwan and Japan, as well as the rates of tumor shrinkage in locally advanced and metastatic patients (Waterfall plot) were also analyzed. Methods: The results of the primary analysis were reconfirmed, and subset analysis of overall survival and progression-free survival was performed based on the overall survival data updated by the cut-off date of 31st July in 2011. Results: The median follow-up period was 29.8 months, and 795 deaths occurred (95.6%). The median overall survival was 8.8 months for gemcitabine, 9.7 months for S-1 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.79–1.17), and 9.9 months for GS (HR 0.91; 97.5% CI 0.75–1.11). In patients with performance status (PS) 0, the median overall survival was 9.8 months for gemcitabine, 10.9 months for S-1, and 10.5 months for GS. In patients with PS 1, the median overall survival was 6.2 months for gemcitabine, 6.3 months for S-1, and 9.6 months for GS. Conclusion: Our survey reconfirmed the non-inferiority of S-1 to gemcitabine and showed S-1 can be used as one of the standard treatment options for advanced pancreatic cancer. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00498225.
KW - Gemcitabine
KW - Pancreatic cancer
KW - S-1
KW - Subgroup analysis
KW - Updated data
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013123660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013123660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00432-017-2349-y
DO - 10.1007/s00432-017-2349-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 28210843
AN - SCOPUS:85013123660
SN - 0171-5216
VL - 143
SP - 1053
EP - 1059
JO - Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
IS - 6
ER -