TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of current automatic smoke evacuation system in flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy
T2 - Its feasibility and potential usefulness
AU - Nose, Yohei
AU - Kato, Motohiko
AU - Aoyagi, Shoma
AU - Akeo, Kazunori
AU - Yamashita, Kotaro
AU - Saito, Takuro
AU - Tanaka, Koji
AU - Yamamoto, Kazuyoshi
AU - Makino, Tomoki
AU - Takahashi, Tsuyoshi
AU - Kurokawa, Yukinori
AU - Eguchi, Hidetoshi
AU - Doki, Yuichiro
AU - Nakajima, Kiyokazu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. DEN Open published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Objectives: Flexible endoscopy does not have a system that can automatically evacuate surgical smoke generated in the gastrointestinal lumen. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and potential usefulness of automatic smoke evacuation systems in flexible endoscopy. Methods: [Bench] After surgical smoke generated in the stomach was evacuated by the evacuator, the degree of residual smoke and gastric luminal collapse were evaluated to optimize the evacuator settings. [Animal] Insufflation, suction, and total operation time to complete the protocol of 10 cauterizations of the gastric mucosa were measured in three groups: “manual suction only,” “manual suction with automatic evacuation (50% force),” and “manual suction with automatic evacuation (70% force).” The stability of endoscopic visualization and operability was evaluated by 10 endoscopists blinded to those suction settings, and the number of manual suctions, insufflations, and total operation time were measured. Results: [Bench] The degree of residual smoke and gastric luminal collapse were inversely correlated. [Animal] When the automatic evacuator was partially used, there was no difference in the insufflation time, but the suction time (vs 50%; p = 0.011, vs. 70%; p = 0.011) and total operation time (vs. 50%; p = 0.012, vs. 70%; p = 0.036) were significantly reduced compared to manual operation only. Furthermore, manual suction with automatic evacuation (50% force) significantly improved the stability of endoscopic visualization and operability compared to manual operation only (p = 0.041, p = 0.0085). Conclusions: The automatic smoke evacuation in flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy was potentially feasible and useful by improving the device setting.
AB - Objectives: Flexible endoscopy does not have a system that can automatically evacuate surgical smoke generated in the gastrointestinal lumen. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and potential usefulness of automatic smoke evacuation systems in flexible endoscopy. Methods: [Bench] After surgical smoke generated in the stomach was evacuated by the evacuator, the degree of residual smoke and gastric luminal collapse were evaluated to optimize the evacuator settings. [Animal] Insufflation, suction, and total operation time to complete the protocol of 10 cauterizations of the gastric mucosa were measured in three groups: “manual suction only,” “manual suction with automatic evacuation (50% force),” and “manual suction with automatic evacuation (70% force).” The stability of endoscopic visualization and operability was evaluated by 10 endoscopists blinded to those suction settings, and the number of manual suctions, insufflations, and total operation time were measured. Results: [Bench] The degree of residual smoke and gastric luminal collapse were inversely correlated. [Animal] When the automatic evacuator was partially used, there was no difference in the insufflation time, but the suction time (vs 50%; p = 0.011, vs. 70%; p = 0.011) and total operation time (vs. 50%; p = 0.012, vs. 70%; p = 0.036) were significantly reduced compared to manual operation only. Furthermore, manual suction with automatic evacuation (50% force) significantly improved the stability of endoscopic visualization and operability compared to manual operation only (p = 0.041, p = 0.0085). Conclusions: The automatic smoke evacuation in flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy was potentially feasible and useful by improving the device setting.
KW - endoscopic submucosal dissection
KW - flexible endoscopy
KW - infection control
KW - smoke evacuator
KW - surgical smoke
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85189959309
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85189959309#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1002/deo2.367
DO - 10.1002/deo2.367
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85189959309
SN - 2692-4609
VL - 4
JO - DEN Open
JF - DEN Open
IS - 1
M1 - e367
ER -