TY - JOUR
T1 - Validity and reliability of the japanese version of the selected anger expression scale and age, sex, occupation and regional differences in anger expression among Japanese
AU - Ohira, Tetsuya
AU - Iso, Hiroyasu
AU - Tanigawa, Takeshi
AU - Sankai, Tomoko
AU - Imano, Hironori
AU - Okamura, Tomonori
AU - Kiyama, Masahiko
AU - Kitamura, Akihiko
AU - Nakagawa, Yuko
AU - Sato, Shinichi
AU - Naito, Yoshihiko
AU - Lida, Minoru
AU - Shimamoto, Takashi
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - To examine the reliability and construct validity of the Japanese version of the Anger Expression Scale among four Japanese communities, and to examine distributions of anger expression scores according to sex, age, occupation, and community, we performed a crosssectional study among 1,802 men and 3,229 women aged 20-70 in four geographic populations in 1995-97. We handed a self-administered questionnaire, which was selected from the Spielberger Anger Expression Scale, to the participants in the risk factor surveys and measured anger-in and anger-out as the anger expression scale. These scales had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.97-0.98 for anger-out and 0.77-0.86 for angerin) and were of almost the same structure as the original. The Pearson correlation coefficients for the anger expression scale examined in 1995 and 1996 were 0.69 for anger-out and 0.57 for anger-in (both p<0.001). The mean scores of both anger-out and anger-in were inversely associated with age. The mean anger-out score was higher for men than for women (p<0.001), whereas the mean anger-in score did not vary significantly between the sexes. Furthermore, the mean scores of anger-out and anger-in varied among populations and occupational groups. The present study suggests that the Japanese version of the selected Anger Expression Scale is an acceptable scale for evaluatinq anger expression among Japanese.
AB - To examine the reliability and construct validity of the Japanese version of the Anger Expression Scale among four Japanese communities, and to examine distributions of anger expression scores according to sex, age, occupation, and community, we performed a crosssectional study among 1,802 men and 3,229 women aged 20-70 in four geographic populations in 1995-97. We handed a self-administered questionnaire, which was selected from the Spielberger Anger Expression Scale, to the participants in the risk factor surveys and measured anger-in and anger-out as the anger expression scale. These scales had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.97-0.98 for anger-out and 0.77-0.86 for angerin) and were of almost the same structure as the original. The Pearson correlation coefficients for the anger expression scale examined in 1995 and 1996 were 0.69 for anger-out and 0.57 for anger-in (both p<0.001). The mean scores of both anger-out and anger-in were inversely associated with age. The mean anger-out score was higher for men than for women (p<0.001), whereas the mean anger-in score did not vary significantly between the sexes. Furthermore, the mean scores of anger-out and anger-in varied among populations and occupational groups. The present study suggests that the Japanese version of the selected Anger Expression Scale is an acceptable scale for evaluatinq anger expression among Japanese.
KW - Anger expression scale
KW - Cross-sectional study
KW - Population-based survey
KW - Questionnaire
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37849187283&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37849187283&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2188/jea.10.118
DO - 10.2188/jea.10.118
M3 - Article
C2 - 10778036
AN - SCOPUS:37849187283
SN - 0917-5040
VL - 10
SP - 118
EP - 123
JO - Journal of epidemiology
JF - Journal of epidemiology
IS - 2
ER -