TY - JOUR
T1 - Water pressure method for duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video)
AU - Kato, Motohiko
AU - Takatori, Yusaku
AU - Sasaki, Motoki
AU - Mizutani, Mari
AU - Tsutsumi, Koshiro
AU - Kiguchi, Yoshiyuki
AU - Akimoto, Teppei
AU - Mutaguchi, Makoto
AU - Nakayama, Atsushi
AU - Takabayashi, Kaoru
AU - Maehata, Tadateru
AU - Kanai, Takanori
AU - Yahagi, Naohisa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Background and Aims: Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered technically challenging and has a high risk of adverse events. However, we recently made some progress with the ESD technique and device by introducing 2 features: a water pressure (WP) method and a second-generation ESD knife (DualKnife) with a water jet function (DualKnife J). The present study aimed to assess whether these changes improved the clinical outcomes of duodenal ESD. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. Among all patients who underwent ESD for superficial duodenal epithelial tumors from June 2010 to December 2018, patients in whom a single expert performed the procedure were included in this study. Various factors, including the use of the WP method and ESD devices (DualKnife or DualKnife J) and the treatment phase (early, mid, and late), were analyzed to determine whether they were associated with intraprocedural perforation and procedure time. Treatment phase was assigned by dividing the study population equally into 3 subgroups according to the treatment phase. Results: The procedure time was significantly shorter, and the proportion of patients with intraprocedural perforations was the lowest in the late phase. Multivariate analysis of the use of the WP method revealed that it significantly decreased the intraprocedural perforation rate (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.96), and analysis of the use of both the WP method (β coefficient, −0.40; P <.01) and the DualKnife J (β coefficient, −0.10; P =.032) revealed they were independently and negatively correlated with procedure time. Conclusion: The present study reveals that the WP method significantly reduced the intraprocedural perforation rate and that both the WP method and the DualKnife J significantly shortened procedure times for duodenal ESD.
AB - Background and Aims: Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered technically challenging and has a high risk of adverse events. However, we recently made some progress with the ESD technique and device by introducing 2 features: a water pressure (WP) method and a second-generation ESD knife (DualKnife) with a water jet function (DualKnife J). The present study aimed to assess whether these changes improved the clinical outcomes of duodenal ESD. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. Among all patients who underwent ESD for superficial duodenal epithelial tumors from June 2010 to December 2018, patients in whom a single expert performed the procedure were included in this study. Various factors, including the use of the WP method and ESD devices (DualKnife or DualKnife J) and the treatment phase (early, mid, and late), were analyzed to determine whether they were associated with intraprocedural perforation and procedure time. Treatment phase was assigned by dividing the study population equally into 3 subgroups according to the treatment phase. Results: The procedure time was significantly shorter, and the proportion of patients with intraprocedural perforations was the lowest in the late phase. Multivariate analysis of the use of the WP method revealed that it significantly decreased the intraprocedural perforation rate (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.96), and analysis of the use of both the WP method (β coefficient, −0.40; P <.01) and the DualKnife J (β coefficient, −0.10; P =.032) revealed they were independently and negatively correlated with procedure time. Conclusion: The present study reveals that the WP method significantly reduced the intraprocedural perforation rate and that both the WP method and the DualKnife J significantly shortened procedure times for duodenal ESD.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096443404&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85096443404&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2020.08.018
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2020.08.018
M3 - Article
C2 - 32853646
AN - SCOPUS:85096443404
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 93
SP - 942
EP - 949
JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
IS - 4
ER -